Fruits and yes
Fruits and yes
There is no word for fruit in the Wakasa Kei. Not only Wakasa Kei but also Mahayana Buddhism as a whole has no fruit. This is the feature of Mahayana Buddhism. There is no Mahayana Buddhism, but there is no explanation about yu. To be justifiable, it is only when you know the true meaning of the letter "A", you can say no.
However, Buddhism has no idea. There is something like a parable. For example, it is in the Buddhist scripture that lights the whole universe with Takahashi Kaneguma, Bilingu Shinkansen Buddha, but this is a thought and not a really personality.
Buddhism does not know where real existence is not non existence. This is the characteristic of Buddhism.
The one with shape is empty because it is color. The color is empty. But what is true real existence that is not color? There are things that are currently appearing as sky. For example, trees are appearing. What does it mean that trees are appearing? Why do substances exist? If it is a colorful airspace, why is the sky appearing as a color?
The sky appears as a color and the cause can not be explained by Buddhism. This can not be helped. If you say why there is no such thing, there is law, it is to understand. Buddha is not a personality called Buddha but a person who has the purpose of understanding. This is Buddha.
There is no God in the Bible in Buddhism. Although it says to be said, in the second rally Tatsuki adopted such thought into Buddhist scripture, Buddha himself does not preach such a thing.
I do not know the true thought of Buddha. It is not understood. I do not know whether Amitabha Nyorai also preached the Buddha himself or not. I explained that the monk, Legislatta Higaoka, was enlightenment and turned into a tusky tree, and explained it with a massless longevity, but this is saying that Amitabha is the bamboo thing, Amida Birthday God was there It is not.
What is real existence? Buddhism is atheism. There is no god. I do not think that heaven and earth was made. I think that the heaven and earth had already existed. Thanks to the four great powers of the geothermal breeze wind, I believe that nature has already been born.
It is said that heaven and earth were born naturally, but what is it that naturally was born? This can not be explained in Buddhism. Buddhism does not have a principal who made heaven and earth. Therefore Buddhism does not have the idea that heaven and earth was made.
I think that the heavens and the earth were made naturally. This is an immediate cause. It is said that a heaven and earth was born by a fate. Then, I do not know if it is something related to the body. I will not explain it any more in Buddhism. It is difficult to say it. Chisato Hideki, it is only enlightenment.
The Bible clearly says that God made heaven and earth in the beginning. The Bible clearly states that God made heaven and earth. Beginning with the Buddha and Buddhism the starting point is different from the root. Because the starting point is different, it is possible to compare symmetrically as a reference.
There is no possession in the general wartnear. Therefore, it is impossible to fully explain humans with Hakkadonoseki alone.
Human own way of thinking is all five empty. It is empty. This is clearly written in the general wartime heart. What humans are currently living for is the sky.
Human beings can not be beaten even if they live in their present state. Even if I do not really know and live, I just die. It is decided to die. So it is meaningless that humans live in their present state.
So you must empty people by all means. Currently humans are living because there must be a cause for that, if you take the attitude to investigate the cause, you will come to know.
God will not know if the current human being approves the living state. It will make life impossible.
If you try to figure out the true life, you must first become empty. If I do not know the sky, I do not know the truth. Actually I do not know unless I know the sky. That is why it is absolutely necessary to have a general sutra.
There is no fruit in the general wartime heart. There is no god. So you have to study the Bible.
Many people in Buddhism say that there is no purpose for what human beings are alive. Zen sect has no purpose in what human lives. It is said so also in Tendai Buddhism.
In Buddhism there is no purpose for what human lives. So even if you ahhhhhaben the present human being, you will not know that there is a human being as a thesis.
It is the sky 's idea to think that Buddha is aware of the death of old age, and it is the ultimate conclusion of Buddhism that human beings live in this world is empty.
Buddha did not see humans just being sky. It seems he was looking at something bigger. However, I have not seen any.
We are not simply doctrinal studies. If we tried to find out exactly the fact that human beings are alive, to the truth, the sky the Wakasa Keisuke said is a very large reference to us.
I think that it is unnecessary to discuss Buddhism with Buddhism whether there is a life beyond the sky. Buddhism is the purpose of seeing the sky than to convey life. Therefore, it is impossible for Mahayana Buddhism alone to complete human completion. Therefore, besides the sky of the Wakasagi sky, bibles presenting the life clearly become necessary.
There is no teaching or doctrine that truly captures life. To be able to grasp the life in substance, it can be said that an amateur is better. Buddha was an amateur who has no relation to religion, but he discovered the great truth of the sky.
Although the thesis of atonement is the thought of the New Testament, even though it is considered from the perspective of the Old Testament, human beings of meat do not exist. The penance of the New Testament does not recognize the human being of the flesh. This is in agreement with the sky of the General Sutra.
It is said that the thought of the flesh is death. To believe that you are being physically present yourself is saying that it is death.
Mahayana Buddhism has a face to affirm a human being, but it is affirming on the premise that it will be empty.
The atonement has the doctrine of atonement as doctrine and the Atonement that the Bible presents straight. The word of atonement is similar, but the content is quite different.
How to make a difference is that the Christian atonement theory redeems human sin by his ransom by human beings who are sinners believe in Christ. It is said that it is regarded as innocent and saved.
Our bleeding will allow our sins. This is not wrong, but words are missing. It is exactly what is saved by the redemption of Christianity, but how to approve that Christ was crucified. The way of approving the cross is a problem.
The crucifix is not just for atonement, it means that the person physically present disappears. "I was crucified with Christ, Paul is saying that I am no longer living" (Galatians 2, 19, 20). This way of thinking. I no longer exist. I am not myself now. It is said that Christ lives in the form of himself. This is the characteristic of the New Testament Atonement theory.
This point is very similar to Buddhist scripture, but there are some differences. If we are going to explore the truth that our lives are saved precisely, we must honestly consider it carefully and grasp certain things.
I think that I do not understand this unless I tell you about the creation of heaven and earth. The Bible has its promise as its principle. It is true that Christ has been sent from God, but this way of speaking alone makes it a religious idea.
The Japanese do not know the promise of God at all. Because Japanese are not promised people, it is hard to understand what God promises are. There is a very important relationship with the promise of God that the earth is the earth.
(Content quoted from Kanji Kajiwara's book)